The appellant asked for the transfer of the
investigation to the special agency on the ground that larger racket involving
forged degrees and invoking consideration of public interest.
The top Court refused to grant for transfer
reiterating the case of Disha
vs. State of Gujarat and others (2011)13 SCC 337 where it was held that
once investigation is complete and the chargesheet is filed, transfer of
investigation can only in exceptional circumstances demonstrating a real
likelihood of bias, malafide, or abuse of power. Similarly, the Supreme Court
in K.V
Rajendran vs. Superintendent of police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai and others
(2013 12 SCC 480, declined to transfer investigation to the CBI despite
allegations of delay and improper investigation. The Court held that mere
dissatisfaction with the manner of investigation or bald allegations
unsupported by cogent material cannot justify invocation of extra ordinary
jurisdiction for transfer of investigation to a central or special agency.
So, applying the above principles in the instant
case, the Court refused to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction to transfer the
case to special agency because no specific of substantial material has been
placed on record to demonstrate that the investigation conducted by the State
Police was vitiated by malafides, bias or extraneous influence attributable to
respondent no. 2. There is also no allegation of involvement of any high
ranking police officials so as to case doubt on the credibility of the
investigation.
Case: Zeba Khan vs. State of UP and Others (2026)
Date of Judgment; 11, February 2026
Coram: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice R. Mahadevan
0 Comments